reviews Archives - Running With Joe

OKX Review for Runners: Why I Use a Second Crypto Exchange

Blog / Joe / crypto, diversification, exchange, gear, okx, race travel, reviews, web3

Third post in the “tools for international race travel” series. After Revolut (digital banking) and Bybit (primary crypto rail), this one’s about OKX — and more importantly, why I keep money on TWO crypto exchanges instead of just one.

Disclosure: Contains referral link. Sign up via my code → both get reduced fees and bonus. No extra cost. Not financial advice. Crypto carries serious risk.

Why Two Exchanges?

In February 2025, Bybit was hit by the largest crypto hack in history. Hackers stole ~$1.5 billion in ETH. Bybit covered all user funds (which is amazing), but the lesson stuck with me:

You don’t keep your training shoes, race gear, and travel docs all in one bag at the airport, right? Same logic for crypto.

I split funds across two reputable exchanges. If one has a problem (hack, regulatory shutdown, frozen withdrawals), I have access via the other.

What is OKX?

Founded 2017, originally as OKEx in China, now headquartered in Seychelles + Dubai. Top 3 global exchange by volume consistently.

What makes OKX different from Bybit (for someone using it as a “money tool”):

More altcoin listings — useful if your sponsor pays in some niche stablecoin or token
Best-in-class Web3 wallet integrated in the app — bridge between centralized and decentralized worlds
Multi-chain support — Ethereum, Solana, BSC, Avalanche, Arbitrum, Base, Polygon, etc
DEX aggregator built into the wallet — better swap rates than using individual DEXs directly

Practical Use Cases for Runners

1. Diversification (the main reason)

50% of stablecoin reserves on Bybit, 50% on OKX. If one exchange has issues, I have the other.

2. Receiving payment from sponsors using less-common tokens

Bybit listings cover 99% of mainstream tokens. OKX adds another 30-40% of long-tail tokens. If a sponsor wants to pay in some specific Layer 2 token, OKX usually has it.

3. On-chain DeFi access via OKX Wallet

Some race entries are now smart contracts on Ethereum (DAO-organized races, NFT-based bibs). OKX Wallet lets me sign transactions on those without a separate MetaMask install. Simpler.

4. Cross-border in countries OKX serves better

Some Asian and Middle East countries have better OKX local fiat onramps than Bybit. If I’m running a race in those regions, OKX is the local-currency bridge.

Spot Trading Fees

Operation	Fee
Spot maker	0.08%
Spot taker	0.10%
USDT (TRC20) withdrawal	~1 USDT
BTC withdrawal	varies (chain dependent)
Web3 swap fee (in-app DEX)	0.875% (rolled into rate)

Slightly cheaper maker fees than Bybit (0.08% vs 0.10%), if you place limit orders.

Setup with Bonus

Visit: https://okx.com/pt-br/join/43152082 (TODO: real link before publishing)
Create account (email + password)
Verify email
KYC Level 1: passport/national ID + selfie
KYC Level 2 (for larger transactions): proof of address + financial info

Or manually enter referral code: 43152082 (TODO real code)

Pros (vs Bybit)

More altcoin / multi-chain coverage
OKX Web3 Wallet is genuinely useful (Bybit’s wallet is more rudimentary)
Slightly cheaper maker fees on spot
DEX aggregator in app

Cons (vs Bybit)

More cluttered UI — Bybit feels cleaner for beginners
Compliance restrictions for some EU residents (post-MiCA)
Less aggressive welcome bonuses in my experience
Historical baggage: OKEx (the original entity) had a 2020 incident in China that paused withdrawals for ~5 weeks. OKX has improved compliance dramatically since, but worth knowing.

When OKX Makes More Sense

Running races in Asia/Middle East where local fiat onramps work better via OKX
You actively use Web3 (DeFi, NFTs, on-chain races)
Your sponsor pays in a less-common token
You want exchange diversification beyond just Bybit

When You Can Skip OKX

You’re running 1-2 races per year, all paid via Revolut
You don’t deal with sponsors or international prize money
You’re already overwhelmed by one exchange

For most casual runners: Revolut + ONE crypto exchange (Bybit OR OKX) covers 95% of use cases. The “use both” approach is for those handling more international finance traffic.

👉 Sign up for OKX with referral (TODO: real link)

Disclosure & Risk

Referral link. Sign up → both benefit. No extra cost.

Cryptocurrency is high risk. Prices are volatile. Exchanges can fail. This post is educational, NOT financial advice. Consult a professional. Comply with your local laws.

Series Navigation

Post 1: Revolut for race trips →
Post 2: Bybit for international race money →
(this post) OKX — diversification + Web3 wallet
[Coming: Final comparison + which exchange combo for which type of runner]

Bonus: MEXC for altcoins not on Bybit/OKX

For long-tail altcoins, I sometimes use a third exchange: MEXC. They list new tokens faster than anyone else. Use sparingly — long-tail altcoins are extreme risk. Not investment advice.

My Personal Setup (TL;DR)

For race travel and international running expenses:

Domestic banking: home country bank (Brazil/etc) — for local stuff
Foreign currency / FX: Revolut multi-currency wallet
Crypto rail #1: Bybit (60% of stablecoin reserves)
Crypto rail #2: OKX (40% of reserves + Web3 access)
Cold wallet: Ledger/Trezor for HODL stack (not used for daily ops)

Total tools: ~4-5 apps. Sounds like a lot but each handles one specific job, and combined they save me hundreds per year in fees compared to “just use my home bank for everything.”

OKX Review for Runners: Why I Use a Second Crypto Exchange Read More »

Bybit Review for Runners: Why I Use Crypto Rails for International Race Money

Blog / Joe / bybit, crypto, exchange, gear, international, race travel, reviews, stablecoin

This isn’t your typical crypto review. It’s about a real-world problem: how do you move money internationally for race trips, prize money, and gear purchases without your bank eating 5-8% in fees?

For me, the answer combines Revolut (covered in last week’s post) with a crypto exchange. This week I’m sharing how I use Bybit as a low-friction “money bridge” for international running expenses.

Disclosure: This post contains a referral link. If you sign up via my code, we both get reduced fees and a welcome bonus. No extra cost to you. Crypto carries real risk — this is educational, not financial advice.

Why a Runner Cares About Crypto Exchanges

If you’ve never run abroad, this won’t apply to you. Skip to the next gear post.

If you have, you know the friction:
– Wiring USD to a foreign training camp — bank charges $40, takes 3 days
– Receiving prize money from an international ultra — same problem, reversed
– Buying race entries when registration system only accepts EUR — your bank’s FX is brutal
– Paying a coach abroad — same currency dance

I started using stablecoins (USDT/USDC) for these flows about 2 years ago. Send/receive in seconds, fees of $1-3 instead of $30-50, no bank gatekeeping.

To do that, you need a crypto exchange that:
1. Lets you convert your local currency to USDT
2. Has cheap withdrawal fees on Tron network (TRC20)
3. Has good liquidity so you don’t lose to slippage
4. Plays nice with KYC across countries

Bybit checks all these boxes for me. Here’s why.

What is Bybit?

Founded in 2018, headquartered in Dubai. One of the top 5 global crypto exchanges by volume. Big in derivatives but also strong on spot trading and stablecoin services.

For a runner using it as a “money rail” (not for trading), what matters:

Fast KYC (15-30 min for level 1)
Stablecoin spot pairs (USDT/USDC against most major fiat options)
Cheap TRC20 USDT withdrawals (~1 USDT)
24/7 customer service (sluggish at peak but responsive)

How I Actually Use Bybit (Non-Trading)

1. Receive prize money or sponsorship in stablecoins

Some race organizers and brands now offer payment in USDT/USDC. Bybit gives me an address; they send; settles in minutes. Compare to:

SWIFT wire: 3-5 days, $30-50 in bank fees, FX markup
Stablecoin via Bybit: 5 minutes, $1-3 fee, exchange spread minimal

2. Cross-border training camp payments

Paying a coach in another country who accepts USDT? Send from Bybit wallet to theirs. Done.

3. Gear purchases from international shops accepting crypto

Some specialty shops (Nordic running gear, ultra-endurance brands) accept BTC/USDT. Buy direct, no FX bank fees.

4. Holding emergency travel funds in stablecoins

Going to a country with weak banking infrastructure or capital controls? Park funds in USDC/USDT on Bybit, draw down via local stablecoin merchants if needed.

⚠️ NOT financial advice — stablecoins have their own risks (de-pegging, regulatory). I keep maybe 5-10% of travel funds in stablecoins as a “Plan B”, not as primary.

Bybit Spot Trading Fees (For Reference)

Even if you’re not trading speculatively:

Operation	Fee
Spot maker	0.10%
Spot taker	0.10%
USDT withdrawal (TRC20)	~1 USDT
USDT withdrawal (ERC20 Ethereum)	~5-15 USDT (gas dependent)
BTC withdrawal	~0.0005 BTC
Deposit	Free

Always use TRC20 for USDT transfers — much cheaper than Ethereum.

Setup with Welcome Bonus

Visit: bybit.com/invite?ref=QAKOBDV
Create account (email + password)
Verify email
KYC Level 1: passport/national ID + selfie. Done in ~15 min.
KYC Level 2 (for larger transactions): proof of address + bank statement. ~24h.
Deposit (USDT via TRC20 is cheapest from another exchange or P2P)
Both of us get the welcome bonus + you get reduced trading fees for 30 days

Bonus tip: I also keep some funds on MEXC for altcoins not yet listed on Bybit. Diversification across exchanges is risk management 101.

Manual code: QAKOBDV (enter at signup if you don’t use the direct link).

Honest Downsides

2025 hack memory: Bybit got hit by the largest crypto hack in history (~$1.5bn ETH stolen) in February 2025. They covered all user funds, but it’s a reminder: don’t keep more on any CEX than you’re willing to lose. Cold wallet (Ledger/Trezor) for HODL, exchange for active use.
Customer support quality varies by hour and language
EU/UK MiCA compliance restricts some features for European residents (e.g., higher leverage, some altcoins)
Not designed for fiat onramps in every country — some places require P2P trading via local agents (more friction)

When NOT to Use Bybit

You don’t trust crypto exchanges in general — fair, stick with Wise/Revolut
You only race domestically — Revolut is enough
You’re under stricter KYC oversight in your country — research local laws first

Bybit + Revolut Combined Workflow (My Setup)

For a typical international race trip:

Income arrives in my home country (BRL, EUR, etc) → Revolut
Major foreign currency expenses (race fees in EUR, hotel) → pay direct via Revolut Mastercard
Cross-border prize money or sponsorship in USDT → Bybit
Convert USDT back to EUR/BRL via Bybit spot → withdraw to Revolut → pay normally
Trip emergencies / countries with weak banking → keep small USDT reserve on Bybit accessible from any internet connection

👉 Sign up for Bybit with referral (code: QAKOBDV)

Disclosure & Risk Notice

Referral link in this post — both of us get a sign-up bonus when you join via my code QAKOBDV. No extra cost to you.

Cryptocurrency carries real risk. Prices are volatile. Exchanges can be hacked or insolvent. Stablecoins can de-peg. You can lose all funds invested. This post is educational/comparative, NOT financial advice or recommendation to invest. Consult a financial professional before making decisions. Comply with your local laws (some jurisdictions restrict crypto activity).

Series Navigation

Previous: Revolut for race trips →
(this post) Bybit — crypto rails for international race money
[Next: OKX — alternative exchange + Web3 wallet for runners traveling]

Bybit Review for Runners: Why I Use Crypto Rails for International Race Money Read More »

Revolut for Runners: How I Pay for International Race Trips Without Getting Hammered by FX Fees

Blog / Joe / gear, marathon abroad, multi-currency, race travel, reviews, revolut, runner finance

I’ve run marathons in Barcelona, Helsinki, Cyprus, and a half-dozen other places outside my home country. Every single one taught me the same painful lesson: using your regular bank’s debit/credit card abroad bleeds money. Foreign exchange fees, IOF, “international transaction” surcharges — they stack up fast.

The fix that actually worked for me is Revolut. This post is an honest review from a runner who travels for races, including how to set up an account with a sign-up bonus.

Disclosure: Some links in this post are referral links. If you sign up using my link, we both get a bonus, at no extra cost to you. I only recommend tools I personally use.

What is Revolut?

Revolut is a UK-based fintech (founded 2015) with 70+ million customers worldwide. Think of it as a digital bank app that replaces your traditional bank for travel-heavy use cases. You hold money in 30+ currencies inside one account, swap between them at near-interbank exchange rates, and spend with a debit card globally.

For a runner who travels for races, the killer feature is the multi-currency wallet + interbank FX rate — no markup, no shady “tourist exchange rate” your bank quietly applies.

Why Runners Should Care About Multi-Currency

If you’ve ever:

Booked a race in Europe and had to pay €60-150 in EUR via card
Stayed in Airbnb in Tokyo and watched yen come out of your account
Bought running shoes from On Running’s UK site for £180
Tipped a sherpa or paid a permit in cash in Nepal/Tanzania

…you know the pain. Bank cards typically charge 3-7% in combined fees and FX markup. On a €1500 trip (race + flights + accommodation), that’s €45-105 in pure fees to the bank. For nothing.

Revolut charges effectively 0-1.5% depending on amount and time of day. Math is obvious.

My Real Use Cases as a Runner

1. Race entry fees in foreign currency

Sign up for the Helsinki Marathon (€135 EUR), Barcelona Half (€55 EUR), Cyprus Marathon ($90 USD). I top up the corresponding currency in the app first, then pay. Zero foreign transaction fees.

Compared to my Brazilian bank card: 6-8% saved per transaction.

2. Hotel/Airbnb bookings abroad

Same thing — book in EUR/USD/GBP with funds already converted at interbank rate. Booking.com, Airbnb, and most hotel aggregators accept Revolut card globally.

3. Race-day expenses (taxi, food, gear shops)

The Revolut physical Mastercard works basically anywhere Mastercard is accepted. Contactless pay on metros, restaurants, gear stores. ATMs work too (free withdrawals up to €200/month on the free plan).

4. Splitting costs with running buddies

Running with a friend? Send them money in any currency instantly via the app. Useful for splitting the rental car or hotel.

5. Travel insurance (premium plans)

The Premium plan ($8/mo) includes travel insurance — useful if you’re flying to a destination race and worried about delays/lost gear. Coverage isn’t comprehensive but it’s a cheap baseline.

Plans Available

Plan	Price	Best for
Standard	Free	Casual race travelers (1-2 races/year abroad)
Plus	~€3/mo	Faster support, more virtual cards
Premium	~€8/mo	Lounge access, travel insurance, higher FX limit
Metal	~€14/mo	Frequent international flyers, higher cashback

For most runners: Standard (free) is enough. Premium is worth it if you fly internationally 4+ times a year.

What I Don’t Love About Revolut

Being honest:

Customer support is chat-only in most cases. If your account gets temporarily frozen (it happens — they’re conservative about fraud detection), getting it unfrozen can take 24-48h.
They sometimes flag legit transactions as suspicious, especially first-time large amounts. Annoying but explainable.
Cash withdrawals are limited on free plan (€200/mo). For races where you need cash for sherpas/local fees, consider upgrading temporarily.
Premium support cards sometimes take 10-14 days to arrive in mail. Order yours BEFORE the race trip, not last minute.

Quick Setup (with bonus)

Click my link: revolut.com referral link
Download the app (iOS or Android)
Sign up with your phone + email
Complete KYC (passport/national ID + selfie + address)
Approval typically in 5-15 minutes
Order physical Mastercard (free shipping in EU/UK; varies elsewhere)
Top up funds via bank transfer or card
Both of us get the sign-up bonus once you complete a qualifying transaction

👉 Sign up for Revolut →

⚠️ Bonus amounts vary by country and may change. Check the app for current promotion after signup.

Comparison: Revolut vs Wise vs Local Bank for Runners

Use case	Revolut	Wise	Local Bank Card
Race fee payment in EUR	✅ Best	✅ Good	❌ 4-7% fees
Hotel booking in foreign currency	✅	✅	❌
Cash withdrawal abroad	✅ Free up to limit	✅ Free up to limit	❌ Often $5+ per ATM
Receive prize money in USD	⚠️ Limited (no IBAN US)	✅ Has US ACH	✅ Slow + expensive
Day-to-day in your home country	❌ Not designed for it	❌ Not designed for it	✅

I use Revolut + my home bank combined. Revolut for travel/multi-currency, home bank for everything domestic. (For sending USD-denominated freelance income to my home account, I use Wise — different tool, different job.)

Final Take

If you race abroad even once a year, Revolut pays for itself on the first trip via FX savings alone. Free plan is more than enough for most runners.

If you’re a one-marathon-per-decade kind of runner who only stays in your home country, you can skip this. Otherwise — open the account, get the card, save yourself the bank fees.

👉 Get Revolut with bonus

Disclosure

Links in this post are referral links. If you sign up using my link, we both receive a sign-up bonus. This does not affect your cost in any way. I have used Revolut personally since 2019 for international travel and race trips, and this review reflects real experience.

This post is informational. Financial products carry risks; check current terms on the official Revolut website before signing up.

Other Tools I Use for Race Travel

Airalo eSIM (use code GUILHE4334 for both of us to get $3 credit) — local data plans without SIM swapping (covered in another post)
Wise — for receiving USD-denominated freelance income (we both get a fee-free transfer when you sign up)
TapTap Send — what I use to send money back to Brazil from abroad. Use code GUILHERM441 and get €10 when you send €25+ (we both benefit)
Booking.com / Airbnb — accommodation
Garmin Connect — synced everywhere

(More gear-and-tools posts coming soon.)

Revolut for Runners: How I Pay for International Race Trips Without Getting Hammered by FX Fees Read More »

Garmin vs. Apple Watch: Which Is the Best for Running?

Blog / Joe / gear, reviews

Short answer: for serious running, Garmin wins on GPS accuracy, training metrics and battery life. The Apple Watch wins if you want one device that does running plus everything a smartwatch does — and you already live in the Apple ecosystem. This 2026 guide breaks down exactly where each one pulls ahead, by model and by runner type.

Garmin vs Apple Watch at a glance (2026)

What matters to runners	Garmin	Apple Watch
GPS accuracy (multiband)	Excellent (FR265/965, Fenix)	Very good (Ultra 2)
Running dynamics (cadence, stride, vertical osc.)	Yes, native	Partial / via apps
Training load & recovery	Yes (Training Status, Body Battery)	Basic (Training Load in watchOS)
Battery (smartwatch mode)	7–20+ days	~1–2 days (Ultra 2 longer)
Battery (GPS run)	20–40+ h	~12 h (Ultra 2 up to ~12–35 h low power)
Sunlight readability	Excellent (MIP/AMOLED)	Very good (AMOLED)
Smart features (calls, apps, pay)	Good	Excellent
ECG / advanced health	On some models	Yes (ECG, blood oxygen*)
Works with Android	Yes	No (iPhone only)
Price range	Wide ($200–$1,000+)	$$$ ($399–$799+)

*Feature availability varies by model and region. Always check the current spec sheet before buying.

The models you’re actually choosing between

“Garmin vs Apple Watch” is really a question of which model. Here are the ones runners shortlist in 2026:

Garmin Forerunner 265 — the sweet spot for most runners: AMOLED screen, multiband GPS, full training metrics, ~13-day battery.
Garmin Forerunner 965 / Fenix series — maps, longer battery, triathlon and ultra features for serious endurance athletes.
Garmin Forerunner 165 — the budget entry that still nails the running essentials.
Apple Watch Ultra 2 — Apple’s only watch built for endurance: brighter screen, longer battery, dual-frequency GPS.
Apple Watch Series — the everyday smartwatch that also tracks runs well, if a day of battery is enough for you.

GPS accuracy: where runs are won or lost

For a runner, GPS accuracy is the single most important spec — a watch that drifts through city blocks or tree cover ruins your pace data. Both brands now offer multiband (dual-frequency) GPS on their running-focused models, which dramatically improves accuracy in tough environments.

Garmin: multiband on the Forerunner 265/965 and Fenix is consistently excellent, even in urban canyons and forest trails. Pace lock is fast and stable.

Apple Watch: the Ultra 2 added precision dual-frequency GPS and is genuinely good now — close to Garmin in most conditions. The standard Series is fine for road running but less reliable on technical trails.

Training metrics and recovery

This is Garmin’s home turf. If you train with structure — intervals, long runs, race builds — the depth matters.

Garmin: native running dynamics (cadence, stride length, ground contact, vertical oscillation), plus Training Status, Training Load, VO2 max estimates, Body Battery, recovery time and daily suggested workouts. Garmin Connect is a genuinely powerful free analysis platform with a large community.

Apple Watch: watchOS keeps closing the gap — it now has Training Load, custom workouts, pace/HR zones and race route features. But for deep running analytics most users still lean on third-party apps (Strava, Runna, Workoutdoors), which adds friction and sometimes a subscription.

Battery life: the deal-breaker for long runs

If you run long, this often decides it. A marathon, an ultra, or even just not wanting to charge daily — Garmin’s lead here is large.

Garmin: 7 to 20+ days in smartwatch mode depending on model, and 20–40+ hours of continuous GPS. Fenix and Enduro models go even further with solar.
Apple Watch Ultra 2: the endurance option — roughly a day and a half of normal use, and extended GPS battery in low-power mode that can cover a marathon and beyond.
Apple Watch Series: about a day to a day and a half — fine for daily training, tight for ultra-distance without charging.

Smart features and ecosystem

Apple Watch: nothing beats it as a smartwatch. Seamless iPhone integration, the full App Store, Apple Pay, messaging, calls, music, a huge app catalogue. If you want one device for life and running, and you have an iPhone, this is the draw.

Garmin: smart features have improved — notifications, Garmin Pay, music storage, Connect IQ apps — but it’s a fitness device first. Crucially, Garmin works with both Android and iPhone, while the Apple Watch is iPhone-only.

Price: which gives runners more?

Garmin: the widest range — from budget running watches around $200 to premium multisport models past $1,000. You can buy exactly the amount of watch you need.

Apple Watch: the Series sits in the mid-premium range and the Ultra 2 is firmly premium — but you’re paying for a flagship smartwatch, not just a running tool.

Which should you buy? (by runner type)

Marathoner / ultra / trail: Garmin (Forerunner 265/965 or Fenix). Battery + GPS + metrics win decisively.
Data-driven training: Garmin — the analytics depth is unmatched out of the box.
Casual runner who wants one do-everything watch (and has an iPhone): Apple Watch Series.
iPhone user who also runs long: Apple Watch Ultra 2 — the only Apple watch that keeps up on endurance days.
Android user: Garmin, by default — the Apple Watch won’t pair with your phone.
Budget-focused runner: Garmin Forerunner 165 — the essentials, done right, for less.

Frequently asked questions

Is Garmin or Apple Watch better for running?

For dedicated running, Garmin is better: more accurate GPS on its running models, deeper training and recovery metrics, and far longer battery. The Apple Watch is the better all-round smartwatch and is plenty for casual runners on iPhone.

Does the Apple Watch track running as accurately as Garmin?

The Apple Watch Ultra 2 with dual-frequency GPS is now very close to Garmin for road running. On technical trails and in dense cities, Garmin’s running models still hold a small edge in consistency.

Which has better battery life for marathons?

Garmin, comfortably. Most Garmin running watches deliver 20–40+ hours of GPS, easily covering a marathon or ultra. The Apple Watch needs low-power mode (Ultra 2) or a charge to get through ultra-distance.

Can I use a Garmin or Apple Watch with an Android phone?

Garmin works with both Android and iPhone. The Apple Watch only works with an iPhone, so Android users should choose Garmin.

The verdict

If running performance is the priority — accuracy, training depth, battery — Garmin is the runner’s watch. If you want one device that runs and does everything else a modern smartwatch does, and you’re on iPhone, the Apple Watch (or Ultra 2 for long days) is a brilliant all-rounder. Match the watch to how you actually train, and either brand has a model that fits.

Disclosure: this post contains affiliate links. If you buy through them we may earn a small commission at no extra cost to you. We only recommend gear we’d run with ourselves. Specs and prices change between model years — confirm current details before purchasing.

Garmin vs. Apple Watch: Which Is the Best for Running? Read More »

Hoka Carbon X3: Comprehensive Long-Term Review for Runners

Blog, Shoe reviews / Joe / gear, reviews, tips

Hey runners! Have you ever wondered if the Hoka Carbon X3 is the game-changer it claims to be? Well, you’re in for a treat. Over the past few months and over than 1000km, I’ve put these shoes through their paces—literally! From marathon training to casual jogs, I’ve tested every aspect of the Carbon X3 to bring you a comprehensive long-term review. Whether you’re a seasoned marathoner or just starting your running journey, this post will give you all the insights you need to decide if these shoes are your next best investment. So, lace up and let’s dive into the nitty-gritty!

Introduction to Hoka Carbon X3

Hey there, fellow runners! If you’ve been eyeing the Hoka Carbon X3 and wondering if it lives up to the hype, you’re not alone. I was in the same boat a few months ago, curious about all the buzz around these high-tech running shoes. So, I decided to take the plunge and test them out myself. And let me tell you, the journey has been nothing short of exhilarating. From the first time I laced them up to the 1000km mark, I’ve experienced all the highs and lows these shoes have to offer. Whether it’s the ultra-lightweight feel or the impressive energy return, there’s a lot to unpack here. So, if you’re curious about what makes the Carbon X3 tick, stick around—I’ve got the scoop for you.

Now, let’s get into the specifics. One of the first things you’ll notice about the Hoka Carbon X3 is its unique design, particularly the carbon fiber plate embedded in the midsole. This feature aims to provide a spring-like effect, propelling you forward with each stride. But does it really work? In my experience, absolutely. Here’s a quick rundown of what I’ve observed:

Comfort: The cushioning is superb, making long-distance runs much more manageable.
Durability: After 1000km, the shoes are still in great shape, a testament to their build quality.
Performance: The carbon fiber plate really does give you that extra boost, especially noticeable during speed workouts.

But it’s not all sunshine and rainbows. There are a few quirks you should be aware of. For instance, the fit might be a bit snug for those with wider feet, so you might want to try them on before committing. Also, while the energy return is fantastic, it does take some getting used to—especially if you’re coming from a more traditional running shoe. Overall, though, the Hoka Carbon X3 has proven to be a reliable companion for all my running adventures. Curious to learn more about the benefits of carbon fiber shoes? Check out my detailed guide here.

Design and Build Quality

Alright, let’s talk about the design and build quality of the Hoka Carbon X3. When I first unboxed these shoes, I was immediately struck by their sleek and modern design. The color combinations are not only eye-catching but also give off a vibe of speed and performance. The upper is made from a breathable mesh material that feels both lightweight and durable. This is a huge plus for those long-distance runs where breathability can make a world of difference. Have you ever had shoes that felt like they were suffocating your feet? Well, that’s definitely not the case here.

One of the standout features of the Carbon X3 is its carbon fiber plate embedded in the midsole. This isn’t just a gimmick; it genuinely provides a responsive and propulsive feel with every stride. Over the past few months, I’ve put these shoes through various conditions—rain, mud, and even some rocky trails—and they’ve held up remarkably well. The outsole shows minimal wear, which speaks volumes about its durability. Here are a few key points that stood out to me:

Upper Material: Breathable and lightweight, perfect for long runs.
Midsole: Carbon fiber plate for added propulsion and responsiveness.
Outsole: Durable with excellent traction, even in wet conditions.

In terms of fit, the Hoka Carbon X3 offers a snug yet comfortable experience. The toe box is roomy enough to accommodate natural foot splay, which is crucial for maintaining comfort over longer distances. If you’ve ever struggled with blisters or tightness in other running shoes, you’ll appreciate the thoughtful design here. So, if you’re looking for a shoe that combines cutting-edge technology with practical comfort, the Hoka Carbon X3 might just be your perfect match.

For those of you just starting your running journey, you might want to check out my guide on how to start running while overweight. Trust me, the right pair of shoes can make all the difference!

Comfort and Fit for Long Runs

When it comes to long-distance running, comfort and fit are non-negotiable. The Hoka Carbon X3 exceeds expectations in both these areas, making it a go-to choice for marathoners and casual runners alike. Have you ever felt that nagging discomfort after just a few kilometers? Well, with the Carbon X3, those days are behind you. From my first run to my latest 30km session, these shoes have consistently delivered unparalleled comfort. The plush cushioning feels like you’re running on clouds, while the snug fit ensures your feet stay secure without feeling restricted.

One of the standout features of the Carbon X3 is its lightweight design. Despite the ample cushioning, the shoe feels incredibly light on your feet, which is a game-changer for long runs. I remember during my Vilnius Half Marathon, these shoes made the difference between a good run and a great run. They offer just the right amount of support, preventing any unnecessary strain on your feet and legs. Here are some key points that make the Carbon X3 a top pick for long-distance runners:

Breathable Upper: Keeps your feet cool and dry, even on hot days.
Ample Cushioning: Provides excellent shock absorption, reducing the impact on your joints.
Snug Fit: Ensures your feet stay in place, minimizing the risk of blisters.
Lightweight Design: Helps maintain your energy levels over long distances.

If you’re looking to enhance your running performance, investing in a pair of Hoka Carbon X3 could be one of the smartest decisions you make. They not only offer exceptional comfort and fit but also contribute to better overall performance. For more tips on improving your running game, check out my post on 5 Key Training Techniques. Trust me, your feet will thank you!

Durability and Longevity Insights

Hey there, fellow runners! When it comes to investing in a pair of running shoes, durability and longevity are key factors we all look for, right? So, how does the Hoka Carbon X3 stack up after months of pounding the pavement? Let me share my experience. After running over 1000km in these shoes, I can confidently say that they hold up impressively well. I’ve taken them through various terrains—from smooth roads to rocky trails—and they’ve proven to be incredibly resilient. The outsole shows minimal wear, and the cushioning remains as supportive as it was on day one. I even wore them during a particularly grueling marathon, and they didn’t let me down!

One of the most remarkable aspects of the Hoka Carbon X3 is its upper material. It’s engineered to be both lightweight and durable, which is a rare combination. I’ve had shoes in the past where the upper would start to fray after a few months, but not with these. The breathable mesh still looks almost new, and the fit hasn’t stretched out at all. Here are some key points I’ve noticed:

Outsole Durability: Minimal wear even after 1000km.
Cushioning: Consistent support and comfort over time.
Upper Material: Lightweight, breathable, and retains its shape.

So, if you’re wondering whether the Hoka Carbon X3 can go the distance, my answer is a resounding yes. These shoes are built to last, making them a solid investment for any serious runner. Have you tried them yet? I’d love to hear about your experiences in the comments below!

Related running shoe & gear reviews

Hoka Carbon X3: Comprehensive Long-Term Review for Runners Read More »

Race Review: Cyprus Half Marathon

Blog, Race Reviews / Joe / races, reviews

Review: Cyrpus marThis weekend, I ran the 25th Cyprus Half Marathon as part of my training for the upcoming Barcelona Marathon, and I have to say it was a unique experience. The race was well-organized, with water stations every 3km. However, the course was a bit monotonous with multiple turnarounds, some hills, and running in the middle of nowhere. Nevertheless, the race was worth it as it provided an opportunity to explore a new country and its culture. There were around 3,000 runners, and I managed to improve my time by 2 minutes compared to my previous half marathon in Barcelona, despite being around 8kg overweight. Overall, I would recommend this race to anyone looking to combine a holiday with a half marathon experience.

The starting line of the Cyprus half marathon is located at the ancient castle, a highly touristic and beautiful location in the city. The stunning views of the Mediterranean Sea, combined with the castle’s unique architecture, make it a perfect backdrop for the beginning of the race. It’s a great way to experience the local culture and history of Cyprus while also participating in a challenging athletic event. The energy and excitement at the starting line are palpable, and runners are sure to feel motivated and inspired to tackle the course ahead.

I ran the Cyprus half marathon wearing the Hoka One One Carbon X3, and it was an amazing experience. The shoes felt incredibly comfortable and light on my feet, and the cushioning provided just the right amount of support for the long-distance run. The Carbon X3 has a unique carbon fiber plate that helps with propulsion, which made a noticeable difference in my running stride. Overall, I was impressed with the shoes’ performance and would highly recommend them to any serious runner looking for a competitive edge.

Despite the monotony of the course, the temperature was ideal with a strong wind that didn’t hinder the race. The course had a few uphill sections, but nothing too difficult. However, I wouldn’t recommend it to those who are looking to set a personal best due to the many turns and lack of variety in the terrain. Overall, it’s a great race for those who want to experience the beautiful scenery of Cyprus and enjoy a well-organized event.

Cyprus, is a small island country located in the Eastern Mediterranean. It is the third-largest island in the Mediterranean Sea and is known for its beautiful beaches, ancient ruins, and rich history. Cyprus has been inhabited since prehistoric times, and has been influenced by many different cultures throughout its history, including Greek, Roman, Byzantine, and Ottoman.

Today, Cyprus is a popular tourist destination, attracting millions of visitors each year. It has a warm, Mediterranean climate, with hot summers and mild winters, making it an ideal place for outdoor activities like running, hiking, and swimming. The island is also famous for its delicious cuisine, which features a blend of Greek, Turkish, and Middle Eastern flavors.

Race Review: Cyprus Half Marathon Read More »

Experience the comfort and performance of Joma R3000

Blog, Shoe reviews / Joe / reviews

Joma, the Spanish brand, designed the latest innovation, the Joma R3000, for serious runners. If you want to improve your performance in mid to long distance races, this shoe is perfect for you. Its lightweight design makes you feel fast and nimble on the road.

What sets the Joma R3000 apart from other running shoes is its incorporation of a carbon fiber plate. This technology is what gives the R3000 its distinctive flying style and provides runners with a responsive and energetic ride. The carbon fiber plate helps to transfer energy from the ground to your feet, making it easier to maintain your pace and push yourself further, the carbon fiber plate also helps to reduce muscle fatigue and prevent injury. This is because the plate acts as a spring, absorbing the impact of each step and reducing the amount of stress placed on your muscles.

This makes the R3000 an ideal choice for runners who want to improve their performance and push their limits. Furthermore, the carbon fiber plate also provides a more stable platform for your foot, allowing you to maintain better control and balance as you run. Whether you’re a seasoned runner or just starting out, the Joma R3000 is a great option for anyone looking to up their game and experience the benefits of cutting-edge technology in their running shoes.

I also make sure to thoroughly test each shoe before writing a review. I believe that it’s important to get a real feel for the shoe and to see how it performs over time. That’s why I make a point to use each pair for at least 120 km before writing a review. This gives me an accurate idea of the shoe’s comfort, durability, and performance, and allows me to provide my readers with an informed and honest opinion. All of the photos in my reviews are taken of the shoes after they’ve been used for the full 120 km, so you can see the wear and tear for yourself.

Joma R3000 running shoes after 120km of use, showing minimal wear and tear.

A side view of the Joma R3000, showcasing its sleek design and comfortable fit during runs.

The Joma R3000 impressed me with its combination of high-tech features and comfort. The shoes offer excellent cushioning, making them perfect for long runs and races. They also have a sleek and stylish silhouette that will make you stand out from the crowd.

After using the Joma R3000 for a few runs, I decided to remove the tongue support in the shoe. I found that this modification made the shoe even more comfortable for me, providing a more snug and personalized fit. The removal of the tongue support did not impact the performance or stability of the shoe.

Last weekend I ran the Barcelona Half Marathon with the Joma R3000 and that was an incredible experience. I had been training with these shoes for a few weeks leading up to the race, and I was impressed with how well they performed. The lightweight design and cushioning made it easy for me to tackle the 13.1-mile course, and I felt comfortable and supported throughout the entire race.

Training for a half marathon while being overweight can be a challenge, but with the right gear, it can make all the difference. After gaining 10kg during the pandemic, I’ve been on a mission to get back in shape and improve my running performance. The shoes offer both comfort and performance, making it easier for me to tackle my training runs and improve my speed.

The lightweight and cushioning design of the R3000 has made a noticeable difference in my overall running experience, and I’m confident that it will continue to help me achieve my running goals.

The carbon fiber plate on the Joma R3000 impressed me with its noticeable increase in speed and energy efficiency. I got a great boost in my training from the R3000, even though it was designed for lighter, faster runners and I’m currently overweight. The shoes helped me push harder and run faster without sacrificing comfort or stability.

I was able to complete the Barcelona half-marathon with a good time for the actual situation, and I know that the Joma R3000 played a big role in that achievement. Overall, I would highly recommend these shoes to any runner looking to improve their performance and reach their goals.

Strengths

Some points to choice the Joma R3000

The lightweight design of the Joma R3000 makes it easier for runners to move quickly and maintain their pace.
The carbon fiber plate provides a responsive and energetic ride, helping you to push yourself further and maintain your pace.
The R3000 offers a comfortable fit, designed with runners in mind and providing a plush and supportive feel.
Durable and long-lasting materials used in the construction of the shoe (using by 120 kms, and it’s like new)

Weaknesses

Not too good at all

Price – The Joma R3000 can be more expensive than other running shoes on the market, which may not be affordable for all runners.
Narrow fit – Some runners have reported that the R3000 has a narrow fit, which may not be suitable for those with wider feet.
Limited color options – The R3000 is currently only available in a limited number of colors, which may not be suitable for all runners.
May not be suitable for runners with wider feet, as the fit can be narrow.

Experience the comfort and performance of Joma R3000 Read More »

Completing the Barcelona Half Marathon: Race Review

Blog, Race Reviews / Joe / races, reviews

Last weekend, I ran the Barcelona Half Marathon and it was an amazing experience! The course took us through the beautiful streets of Barcelona, past iconic landmarks and along the Mediterranean Sea. The atmosphere was electric, with thousands of runners from all over the world coming together to challenge themselves and celebrate the love of running.

Medal of Barcelona Half Marathon 2023, Mitja Marato — Medal of Barcelona Half Marathon 2023

The race started at Arc de triomf and took us through some of the most historic and beautiful areas of the city. From there, we ran along the stunning Gran Via, one of Barcelona’s most famous streets lined with shops and cafes. The route also took us past La Sagrada Familia, the famous church designed by Antoni Gaudi, and along the Mediterranean Sea. The scenic views of the city and sea were breathtaking and made the run even more enjoyable. It was especially interesting for me as a local resident to run through the heart of the city and experience it from a different perspective. Running past the iconic Sagrada Familia and the bustling beaches of Barceloneta was truly unforgettable.

I trained for months leading up to the race, and it was all worth it when I crossed the finish line. The feeling of accomplishment and pride was incredible, and the support from the crowd was truly inspiring. The organizers did a fantastic job of putting on a well-organized and safe race, with water stations and medical support available along the route.

The Joma R3000

the Joma R3000 was the perfect shoe for the Barcelona Half Marathon. From the moment I put them on, I could feel the support and comfort they provided. The carbon plate technology in the sole of the shoe gave me the extra push I needed to keep going, especially during the latter stages of the race. The cushioning in the midsole was also top-notch, providing me with a smooth and comfortable ride from start to finish.

The design of the Joma R3000 was also a standout feature for me. The sleek and modern look of the shoe caught the attention of many of my fellow runners, and I received several compliments on the shoes throughout the race. The combination of performance and style made the Joma R3000 the perfect shoe for the Barcelona Half Marathon, and I would highly recommend them to anyone looking for a new pair of running shoes. Whether you’re a seasoned runner or just starting out, the Joma R3000 is sure to exceed your expectations.

Stryd

During the Barcelona Half Marathon, I also used a power meter from Stryd. This device helped me to monitor my running power and pace throughout the race, allowing me to make adjustments on the fly and ensure I was running at my optimal level. The Stryd power meter provides real-time data on my running performance, including my running power, stride length, cadence, and more. This information allowed me to make informed decisions during the race, such as adjusting my pace to conserve energy for the final stretch or pushing harder when I felt good.

Overall, using the Stryd power meter was a game-changer for me during the Barcelona Half Marathon. It gave me a new level of insight into my running performance and allowed me to run more efficiently and effectively. Whether you’re a beginner or an experienced runner, I highly recommend giving the Stryd power meter a try. It will help you to better understand your running performance and make the most of your training and racing.

If you’re a runner, I highly recommend participating in the Barcelona Half Marathon. It’s a great opportunity to challenge yourself and experience one of the most beautiful cities in the world. Whether you’re an experienced runner or a beginner, this race is a must-do for anyone who loves running and adventure.

Overall, running the Barcelona Half Marathon was an unforgettable experience, and I can’t wait to do it again. So, if you’re looking for a new challenge and an opportunity to explore one of the most beautiful cities in the world, I highly recommend checking out the Barcelona Half Marathon. You won’t be disappointed!

Completing the Barcelona Half Marathon: Race Review Read More »